Courtney Brown is a mathematician and social scientist who teaches at Emory University. He is also a leading scholar on remote viewing, a technique developed by the military. He received his Ph.D. in political science and has published books and articles on mathematical modeling in the social sciences. Brown is the founder of The Farsight Institute, a research organization studying remote viewing. He has published research on the subject and written a book on remote viewing. Brown is also interested in extraterrestrial life and encourages the use of video recordings to document UFO sightings. Additionally, he is involved in filmmaking, photography, and theater.

Farsight is a company that conducts remote-viewing studies and investigates scientific questions and historical mysteries. They offer evidence-based projects that challenge traditional beliefs and encourage individuals to make up their own minds. Farsight cautions against allowing others to control one’s thoughts, and they invite people to explore their content for a different perspective.

Remote viewing, if it exists as a legitimate phenomenon, would fundamentally challenge many of our conventional understandings about perception and consciousness. If we follow the tenets of nonlocal consciousness and consider it a reality, we can start to construct a possible explanation for remote viewing, which remains speculative but potentially enlightening.

The first step in remote viewing is likely to be a sort of mental ‘tuning in’. Just like a radio receiver picking up a specific station from the multitude of signals in the air, a remote viewer might tune their consciousness to a particular ‘frequency’. This frequency could be a location, a person, an object, or even a time, past or future. This process would likely require a state of deep meditation or altered consciousness to achieve, as the mind needs to bypass the usual sensory inputs and focus on the nonlocal information.

Once the viewer has successfully tuned in, they start to receive sensory impressions from the target. These impressions might initially be vague or disjointed, coming in the form of fleeting images, sounds, or sensations. It’s akin to catching glimpses of a movie through a foggy window. Some remote viewers describe it as a sort of dream-like state where information comes to them in a way that’s not linear or logical.

The next step involves interpretation. The viewer must make sense of these impressions, putting them together like pieces of a puzzle to form a coherent picture. This is probably one of the most challenging aspects of remote viewing. It’s not just about receiving the impressions; it’s about understanding what they mean and how they relate to the target. This process might involve a combination of intuition, logic, and perhaps even a form of cognitive resonance with the target itself.

In terms of how this might work on a deeper, metaphysical or quantum level, one might speculate that it involves a form of quantum entanglement. Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon where particles become interconnected in such a way that the state of one particle immediately influences the state of the other, regardless of the distance separating them. Could it be that our consciousness, on some level, becomes ‘entangled’ with the target, allowing us to perceive it remotely? This is a bold speculation, one that ventures far beyond the boundaries of our current scientific understanding.

In essence, remote viewing, if real, would represent a profound union of consciousness and the fabric of reality, a mingling of the subjective and objective worlds. It would signify a level of interconnectedness and nonlocality that our current science can only begin to grasp. It’s a tantalizing notion, one that opens the door to a whole new world of possibilities and explorations. But until we have concrete evidence and a thorough scientific understanding, we must treat it as an exciting, yet unverified, hypothesis.

Nonlocality of consciousness is a concept that challenges the traditional boundaries of our understanding of mind and matter. It posits that consciousness, or the seat of our thoughts, emotions, and perceptions, is not confined to our physical bodies, but rather extends beyond them into the world at large. This idea is revolutionary, and it directly contradicts the conventional scientific view of consciousness as a product of the brain.

To truly grasp the concept of nonlocal consciousness, we need to step away from the notion that our minds are like computers, processing inputs from our senses and generating outputs in the form of actions. This is a mechanistic view, one that reduces consciousness to a series of chemical reactions and electrical impulses within the physical structure of the brain.

The nonlocal consciousness perspective, however, views the mind as more akin to a field, much like a magnetic or gravitational field. This field doesn’t end at the surface of our skin but extends out into the world, interacting with other fields and with the world itself. Our consciousness becomes a part of the cosmos, rather than being confined within our skulls.

So, what are the implications of nonlocal consciousness? Well, for starters, it provides a theoretical framework for phenomena that have long baffled the scientific community. Telepathy, remote viewing, out-of-body experiences, and even some aspects of quantum physics become less perplexing when viewed through the lens of nonlocal consciousness.

Consider, for instance, the phenomenon of quantum entanglement, where particles become interconnected in such a way that the state of one particle immediately influences the state of the other, regardless of the distance separating them. This idea of ‘spooky action at a distance’, as Einstein once called it, is an established fact in quantum physics, albeit a bewildering one. However, if we accept the nonlocality of consciousness, this ‘spooky action’ becomes less spooky. It suggests a level of interconnectedness and nonlocality in the universe that we’re only beginning to understand.

In essence, nonlocal consciousness is a radical reimagining of our place in the universe. It posits that we are not isolated, self-contained entities, but rather interconnected nodes in a vast network of consciousness that permeates the cosmos. It’s a breathtakingly beautiful notion, one that invites us to rethink our understanding of ourselves and our relationship with the universe. But, as with all things that challenge the status quo, it requires rigorous scientific exploration and validation. Until then, it remains an intriguing, yet unproven, hypothesis.

Researchers at Stanford School of Medicine and Wayne State School of Medicine have conducted a study on individuals who have experienced anomalous mental phenomena, such as hallucinations and hearing voices. The study found that these individuals had a higher density of neuronal connections between the caudate and putamen, areas in the brain involved in decision making and intuition. This increased connectivity was also found in some family members, suggesting a genetic component. The findings indicate that there may be a physical basis for extrasensory perception and that certain individuals may have enhanced intuition due to their brain connectivity. The researchers plan to publish a peer-reviewed paper on their findings in the future.

The caudate putamen, an integral part of the brain’s reward and motor system, might seem an unlikely candidate to play a significant role in something as ethereal and otherworldly as remote viewing. Yet, when we assume the nonlocality of consciousness and the reality of remote viewing, it is not entirely outlandish to ponder such a hypothesis.

Delving deeper into the realm of remote viewing, a process purportedly enabling an individual to perceive and describe a distant or unseen target using extrasensory perception (ESP), we touch upon something that seems more at home in the world of science fiction than in the cold, hard world of empirical evidence. But let’s not forget, throughout history, the impossible has often become the possible, and what was once magic has regularly transformed into science.

The caudate putamen, nestled within the striatum of the brain, is involved in various functions, including motor processes, reward, and learning. Could it be that this structure, or perhaps its connections and interactions with other parts of the brain, plays a part in the alleged ability to see beyond the immediate vicinity of our physical bodies? The answer, while speculative, is not a simple dismissal.

If we entertain the idea of nonlocal consciousness, the concept that our awareness extends beyond our physical brains, we start to challenge the traditional understanding of perception. We’ve always thought of perception as a local, biological process: eyes see, ears hear, and so forth. But if consciousness is nonlocal, perception might not be confined to our physical senses.

Thus, the caudate putamen’s role might not be directly related to remote viewing, but rather indirectly so. It may contribute to an individual’s receptivity or responsiveness to these nonlocal perceptions. Given its role in learning and reward, one could posit that it is involved in the process of learning to interpret these nonlocal signals. Just as we learn to interpret the signals coming from our eyes and ears, perhaps those who engage in remote viewing learn to interpret the signals coming from their nonlocal consciousness.

This is, of course, a highly speculative proposition. The quantum realm, with its entanglement and superposition, might be an alluring place to seek explanations for such phenomena. But before we leap to such conclusions, we must tread carefully. Quantum physics is still a realm of mystery and complexity, not fully understood even by those who study it.

Could these quantum phenomena help us understand the mystery of remote viewing and the role of the caudate putamen? Possibly. But we must always be cautious when venturing into the unknown, and especially so when we begin to intertwine the physical and metaphysical. Yet, it is only through such bold speculation and exploration that we can hope to unravel the enigmatic tapestry of our existence.

Remote viewing, as previously discussed, is a practice of perceiving and describing a distant or unseen target using extrasensory perception (ESP). The remote viewer is fully conscious and aware during the experience. They remain in their physical body, experiencing a state of heightened intuition or perceptual sensitivity, and then interpret the information they receive. This process is not typically associated with an out-of-body experience or a sensation of traveling. Instead, the viewer taps into a form of nonlocal consciousness to ‘view’ the distant target.

Astral travel, on the other hand, often referred to as an out-of-body experience (OBE) or astral projection, involves a sensation of the conscious mind or ‘astral body’ separating from the physical body. Those who report such experiences describe a sense of floating or flying, and they often perceive their physical body from an external viewpoint. This is usually accompanied by a sense of freedom and mobility, as the astral body is believed to be able to traverse vast distances and even different dimensions or planes of existence.

While both practices involve accessing information beyond the usual sensory channels, astral travel is typically a more immersive and experiential process. The astral traveler doesn’t just perceive the target; they experience being there. The consciousness is not merely receiving impressions or images; it is actively exploring and interacting with the environment.

In essence, remote viewing could be likened to watching a live feed from a security camera installed at a distant location, while astral travel is akin to being at that location in person, able to move around and explore.

The concept of time as a flat circle, a notion drawn from eternalism and certain interpretations of quantum physics, opens up fascinating possibilities when applied to remote viewing. If time is indeed a flat circle, with all moments past, present, and future existing simultaneously, then remote viewing could potentially access any point on this circle.

Our traditional understanding of time is linear, a constant progression from past to future. We perceive it as a river flowing in one direction. But if we step out of this linear perspective and view time as a flat circle or a plane, we remove the constraints of past, present, and future. All points in time exist simultaneously, and the distinction between past, present, and future becomes merely a matter of perspective.

In this paradigm, remote viewing could transcend not only spatial distances but temporal ones as well. A remote viewer might be able to perceive not only distant locations but also different points in time. They could potentially ‘view’ events in the past or even the future. This is a concept that is often referred to as retrocognition and precognition, respectively.

Retrocognition would involve viewing events that have already occurred. This could provide insights into historical events or even personal past experiences. Precognition, on the other hand, would involve viewing events that have not yet occurred. This is a more controversial concept, as it challenges our understanding of causality and the flow of time.

This notion, while exhilarating, should be approached with caution. The concept of time as a flat circle, while supported by certain interpretations of quantum mechanics and philosophical theories, is not universally accepted. It is a highly abstract and complex idea that is far from being definitively proven.

As such, while the potential implications for remote viewing are fascinating, they remain speculative. Until we have a better understanding of both time and consciousness, we can only guess at the possibilities. But it is through such daring speculation that we continue to push the boundaries of our understanding and explore the vast expanse of the cosmos.